Updates from Xavi Gracia Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Xavi Gracia 10:00 am on December 16, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , comfort zone   

    The CIO’s mission 

    Estimated reading time: 3 minutes

    In my other posts, I’ve mentioned how we companies are forced to “make more out of less”. Without a doubt, new technologies play a key role in all this.

    It’s the CIO’s mission to propose the most suitable technologies for an increasingly global business, where compatibility and interpolarity (or the capacity for integration) are a fundamental part of companies’ growth, development and continuity.

    The CIO as an promoter and facilitator needs to be alway prepared for the countless opportunities that arise each day and take advantage of them to break molds and cultural barriers, proposing solutions based on “cloud computing”, providing greater flexibility and efficiency in economic resources and structure.

    What are the advantages of “cloud computing”?

    CIOs need to leave their “comfort zones” behind and take risks for the good of the business, adopting more innovative solutions that lighten the structure, easing costs and rollout times in projects. Without a doubt, this enables CIOs to grow and provide better business focus in their area.

    IT areas need to become a keystone in the company’s development, with “project leader” profiles that provide creative and innovative solutions that are sustainable over time.

    Sincerely, I believe it’s a moment for opportunity for everyone, especially for CIOs, provided their priority is focused on the business and helping to generate income.

     

     
  • Xavi Gracia 9:50 am on October 27, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    The CIO can also generate income 

    Estimated reading time: 3 minutes

    We find ourselves in an extremely complicated environment where meeting objectives and keeping within the budget is very difficult.

    IT departments are under pressure to reduce costs and focus on showing the ROI on projects that are being carried out.  In this sense, things are being done well and a focus is being put on what is necessary like the rationalization of the technology in many companies that have been victims of the excesses that were the norm in “fat cat” times.

    But is focusing on this enough?

    My understanding would be NO.

    The CIO can and should contribute towards increasing sales by aligning IT with the business strategy and if the organisation allows it, by designing the company’s strategic plan, bearing the advantages that IT can bring in mind.

    The majority of IT departments have overcome the challenge of internal customer (“the users“) focus with flying colours, but now it is time to focus on the customers that deliver our daily bread: sales!

    At the start of any project, the technology should be selected or prioritised in the systems plan and we should concentrate on what it can contribute in order to maximise sales.

    • Develop new distribution channels
    • Create new products / services
    • Business intelligence
    • Getting to know the client, segmentation
    • Value-added services
    • Loyalty

    It’s really not that difficult, it’s just a matter of thought; a mini project that can maximize sales, working with the Sales and Marketing area from the outset, putting it into practice, measuring results. By doing this, we can ensure that IT becomes an income generator.

     

     
  • Xavi Gracia 10:00 am on September 15, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: BPM, , , , , SAP, SCM,   

    IS/IT, ICT, CRM, ERP, BI, Web 2.0… the key to success lies in their use 

    Estimated reading time: 3 minutes

    Do these concepts sound familiar to you?

    • Information systems, ICT, IT…
    • ERP (“SAP”), CRM, BI, SCM, BPM…
    • Intranet 2.0, extranet, job-sites…
    • Virtual community, multichannel strategy…
    • Web 2.0

    All of these concepts form part of our day to day, and both businesses and people alike have incorporated them as though they are part of our DNA.

    In practice, they really are part of our DNA as we use them intensively. Whether directly or indirectly, they are ever-constant in our day to day, no matter what our position is.

    The adoption has been good in some cases; in others, not so good.

    Let’s take a few examples:

    • Does it make sense to implement a CRM system if we are not customer-focused?  NO.
    • Does it make sense to implement an ERP system if we are not prepared to carry out process re-engineering?  NO.
    • Does it make sense to implement an employee portal if we’re not interested in their opinions?  NO
    • Does it make sense to implement a social network if we’re not interested in sharing?  NO

    At a time like now in which we need to do more with less, we need to ask ourselves these questions as a company. If the answers are NO, then we should be capable of neutralising them and converting them into a YES.

    How?  By being customer-oriented, by improving our processes, by bearing collective intelligence in mind and sharing knowledge (our greatest asset).

    We already have information systems and communication systems within our organisations.  We battle with them every day within our organisations. We have adopted them and they have become part of our DNA… But now, we only need to believe in the reasons behind choosing to implement them.

    In short…

    These days we CANNOT AFFORD not to TAKE ADVANTAGE of the opportunities that new technologies offer us.

    If we make the most of them from the start of a business plan, project or any business initiative, we will get a competitive advantage that will no doubt improve our balance sheet.

     

     
  • Xavi Gracia 10:30 am on July 19, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , ,   

    Aligning “Social Media” with the business. A CIO’s view 

    Estimated reading time: 3 minutes

    We find ourselves at a time in which selling is difficult. Conventional advertising is not enticing enough, TV campaigns are very costly, TV spots are very long and on occasions don’t achieve the desired business objectives.

    On the other hand, we have the Social Media Marketing explosion, which appears to be the answer to everything.

    Social Media has come to stay. For this reason, we need to incorporate it on all levels of the business. However in all cases, it must be carried out correctly and in line with the business plan, rather than as an independent initiative from the marketing or on-line department.

    If we as a company decide to introduce Social Media Marketing, we should interiorize it in the same way as implementing a CRM system, so that all areas and departments work in a customer-oriented manner.

    Today, conversations take place on the Internet and we need to listen to them, though this is pointless unless we are capable of processing this information and able to make decisions.

    In short, if we introduce Social Media, we should do it considering all the consequences.

    • Alignment: Integrating it within the marketing, sales plan… and not as an isolated action that “someone” from marketing leads (generally the junior PM, because he or she is the youngest and has “Facebook” skills).
    • TV+Internet: If the strategy is TV+Internet, the potential impact is significant (if done correctly).
    • ICT: Have all of the IT systems (ICT) prepared for the possible outcomes and for the virility generated by social networks during the TV spot (I repeat, the combination of TV+Internet is very powerful!)
    • Sharing information: Everybody should know of the existence of the campaign (customer services, sales networks, call centers, etc), even if this is via “Facebook”. It will have an impact on all areas of the company (including finance!).
    • Actions: Conversations are on the Internet and it must be listened to, but there is no point if we don’t analyze the information obtained and take consequential measures.
    • Community manager: We need to take on the role of “community manager”… we know our brands best. :-)

     

     
  • Xavi Gracia 10:05 am on June 20, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: business plan, , , systems plan   

    IT Plan: The key to success 

    Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

    There is no doubt about the importance of the business plan as a strategic document regarding the next steps that a business will follow over the coming years as well as the fact that this business model must be constantly edited and updated according to a series of variables, especially in current times.

    Business plans are a lot shorter now than they were 20 years ago.  Globalization as well as a new macroeconomic and geopolitical environment has converted strategy into constant tactics which means the business model is under constant review. Inevitably all of this has an impact on IT systems.

    ITsystems strategy planning varies according to the sector and nature of the business but it is essential that the Systems plan is in line with the business strategy (the business plan).

    The role of the CIO as facilitator for change and to ensure the transformation of business processes has a key function for any company wanting to move forward integrating IT with the business which is creating flexible and scalable information systems that allow for adaptation to change as well as the transformation of the company in order to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage over time.

    What measures can we take?

    • Having a systems plan with allow us to keep shaping tactics towards business needs
    • Having a systems plan allows the business to take advantage of new technologies as a source of competitive advantage
    • Integrating technology into the Development of the business plan right from the start

    By doing this we will achieve:

    • + Synergies
    • + Income
    • + Innovation
    • + Service
    • + Productivity
    • + Collaboration
    • + Take advantage of the competitive advantages offers by technology itself and by using the application we offer in our business
    • - Cost

    Companies should evolve from having the “traditional” Information Systems Department to having an Information Systems Department 2.0, making it more flexible and business oriented.


     
  • Xavi Gracia 1:21 pm on May 18, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , ,   

    From “IT Manager” to CIO 2.0: Opportunity or threat? 

    Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

    Information Technology (IT) has revolutionised our society, business and as a consequence, the way we do things.

    All areas and functional departments are experiencing a complete transformation and reinventing their work each day. We find ourselves in a globalised, changing environment, highly competitive and where doing more with less has never been so needed.

    Everything is a process and teamwork oriented profiles are required to contribute more than what their job description implies.

    We should all possess an innovation component within our profiles and this should be apparent through the decisions we make, whatever our functional responsibilities may be.

    If we focus on the CIO, I think there is a great opportunity to lead the organisation within this role and to bring the rest of the functional directors (finance, sales, marketing, operations…) to join this orientation towards innovation, change and daily reinvention of the business.

    So why the CIO?  Because I am convinced that the business oriented CIO has the necessary qualities to initiate this change:

    • They are aware of the technological possibilities
    • They know how to make the most of it in order to ensure a competitive advantage for the business
    • They are Project oriented (these days everything is a project)
    • They have a vision of the entire business that allows them to consider all areas
    • They are constantly result oriented
    • They lead multi-discipline teams
    • They control costs
    • They negotiate with service providers
    • They externalise

    The CIO 2.0 should be perceived by the rest of the organisation as a motor for change, someone who is always ready for a business challenge and who will be capable of proposing a creative, business oriented solution that is feasible and has a return on investment.

    In order to obtain this role as a business transforming CIO 2.0, it is necessary that the CIO remove the “IT Manager” role from themselves and should jump straight in contributing all of the knowledge they have (which is a lot!) and be capable of relaying this to the rest of the organisation.  The CIO has to take a risk and step outside their “comfort zone” and not settle for just reducing costs, they need to generate income via new technologies due to not only the value they add by themselves but also their fit within the business.

    In that moment, the organisation will perceive the CIO as one of its main assets and before considering any business projects the CIO will be involved from the start, their vision and value proposal will be the key to success.

    To summarise, I am convinced that the CIO is one of the most important assets an organisation can have contributing towards change, innovation and constant improvement, but it is necessary for the CIO to take on this role personally and be capable of transmitting this to the rest of the organisation, leading the transformation of the business.

    Going back to the post title: From “IT Manager” to CIO 2.0: Opportunity or threat?

    For sure: OPPORTUNITY.


     
  • Xavi Gracia 11:30 am on April 7, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , ,   

    Knowledge 2.0: A company’s greatest asset 

    Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

    We all agree that the greatest asset a company can have nowadays, is its collaborators and their knowledge. It is very difficult for a company to differentiate itself by its product, price… what really sets things apart is the service.

    There are many companies that do practically the same thing in a given sector: some make a profit whilst others lose money… What differentiates them is the way they do things.

    In a world gone global, productivity is key and if we are incapable of sharing knowledge, our productivity cannot improve.

    We are experiencing a work climate in which dismissal and people leaving the company within 5 minutes is rife (in most cases, they cannot even access their computers)… and without warning…  But has the organization gained all of the knowledge from that collaborator that has been “invited to be happier elsewhere”? The answer is NO.  What does it cost a company who has not been capable of capitalizing on its greatest asset (knowledge) from that collaborator?

    How many CRMs are at only 50% of their potential whilst sales reps collect business cards in their desk drawers? When they leave a company, those business cards leave with them, their notes, information known only to that person and that has not been previously shared.  The sales rep’s perspective is that they are ‘their clients’ but in reality, they belong to the company.  It is the company’s mistake to have been incapable of capitalizing on those relationships and contacts.

    The majority of companies have a transactional ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) system, or a CRM (Customer Relationship Management) and in the best of cases, a BI (Business Intelligence) system.  The question is if the majority of companies could implement these types of corporate systems, why would some obtain a competitive advantage and not others? Clearly it is in the use given to this type of Information system.   I think we all get the idea up to this point but what is key?

    Without a doubt, the key lies within the sharing of the knowledge, the establishment of synergies, economies of scale, being customer oriented from all departments and areas of the company, to have a clear idea of process and endless key concepts that we all know and share but in most cases, only go as far as being good intentions.  Today we have the opportunity to truly share the knowledge. The only thing we need to do is when we consider any business project in whatever area it may be, we think about capitalising on it from beginning to end.

    My recommendation is the implementation of an enterprise social network that will allow us to obtain the maximum performance from our greatest asset.  Knowledge.

    Let’s start working towards truly becoming an enterprise 2.0!

    To summarize:

    1. Knowledge is the greatest asset of a company.
    2. Sharing it improves productivity.
    3. The way in which things are done is the real differentiating factor.
    4. It is the responsibility of the company to capitalise on and make most use of the knowledge held by its collaborators.
    5. Sharing adds up.
    6. Not sharing does the opposite.
     
  • Xavi Gracia 10:30 am on March 11, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , profit & loss, , value chain   

    Can new technologies improve the company’s Profit & Loss? 

    Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

    We are dealing with a highly competitive business environment, transformed and globalised which compels us to do more with less.  In this scenario, Information Systems and  Information and Communication Technologies (IS / ICT) have gone from being a support function to being a decisive factor when it comes to strategy, development and the growth of a business.

    In order to maintain an optimum competitive advantage as well as to make the optimum use of IS / ICT, it is vital that we align these with the business strategy.  This becomes necessary by establishing a Systems Plan that meets the business’ needs on a short and long term basis.

    Process orientation and the technological component of any business project of a business makes it fundamental that both the CEO as well as the operational directors understand the IS / ITC that form the current company.  In the same way, it is key for the CIO to manage the Information and Communication Technologies and ensures Communications use business criteria as well as being able to anticipate the needs of the business.

    The role of the CIO as the facilitating as well as transforming element of the business becomes one of taking the initiative and proposing innovative ideas that will allow the company to improve its results, increase its income, reduce costs and shorten the time to market until the product, good or service is launched.

    If we consider the ICT value model the four dimensions that are income, innovation, service and costs, we will find that Zyncro meets the model requirements to perfection, offering ICTs the desired value:

    There are various reasons why Zyncro is aligned with this model in its four dimensions:

    Income:

    • Improves productivity.
    • Improves the serviced offered to internal and external clients.
    • Improves processes.
    • Having Zyncro available allows us to open up new business possibilities and reach places that were unthinkable prior to the introduction of this social technology.  A new division, a new business, a new line, a new process…  With Zyncro we can try everything!

    Innovation:

    • Taking on this new technology can generate competitive advantages with the rapid implementation of new projects and initiatives in a very fast, secure and efficient manner.  In this way, ICTs will not slow things down but will be an innovative boost for the company.
    • The company can consider new products and services based on this collaborative environment that opens up unlimited possibilities.
    • Collective intelligenceZyncro allows for the sharing of the organisation’s knowledge, it captures and stores it whilst it circulates around the company (among collaborators, providers, clients, etc) and organises the “unstructured” information (that which is in “someone in a departmental database’s e-mail, local files…”), because Zyncro implies the integration of people, processes and knowledge.

    Service:

    • Always-On: Always connected and available from any location, moment and device (today the world is already like this).
    • High integration capacityZyncro will integrate all the “satellite” applications that exist within the company (office automation files, *.pdf, e-mail, calendar, agenda…).  And during the coming days, it will also be possible to integrate APIs with operational applications (ERP, CRM, BI….).
    • Plug & play: This software is easy to implement and has no installation or license costs.  .

    Costs:

    • With Zyncro we move from having CAPEX to OPEX (But a very acceptable OPEX!)
    • ROI: The return on investment is extremely fast and easy to quantify.
    • Cost of adaptation is almost nonexistent, due to the fact that it is based on the usability of the most popular social networks.
    • What does it normally cost to create a new user on an IT level? This refers to activating all the tools and applications needed for that particular position on a hardware and software level?  A lot! Licenses of all sorts, servers that can run applications and other applications so that with each newcomer, running costs rise from year to year due to high maintenance costs.  With Zyncro, the cost of each new user is reduced dramatically.
    • Easy alignment with the Systems Plan (high integration).

    For sure, CIOs are obliged to ensure that the ICTs contribute towards a better Profit & Loss.  We should be brave and take decisions that allow the transformation of a traditional company into a 2.0 company, take advantage of the competitive advantages offered by new technologies and align these with business strategy and tactics and above all, make a contribution to growth.

    We should also orientate ourselves towards ROI and obtain a fast return on investment, convince the financial area on models such as SaaS or the cloud and convert CAPEX into OPEX.

    In a business world where we are compelled to do more with less, we are obliged to keep an open mind and be results orientated.

    I am convinced that the adaptation to Zyncro technology within a company is a very good value proposal that can generate income, allow innovation, provide an excellent quality of service and in addition, reduce costs.

    “Can new technologies improve the company Profit & Loss? In answer to the question posed by the article: The answer is simply: YES.  And they not only can, but should contribute to improving it.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel